Corrupt Children Aid Society. TRANSCRIPT
Corrupt Children Aid Society. TRANSCRIPT
So again, please identify the signature of the Registrar at your civil office that signed the order.
Thank you.
Dear Mr. F
Yes I did sign the orders it is my signature on the orders. The administrative process of entering the order into the computer system is one that is done by staff in the Civil Office. So in short the orders were signed by me.
I hope this assist you.
Sincerely
Kevin R. Lyle Manager of Court Operations For the Judicial Districts of Sudbury and Manitoulin Phone: 705-564-7769 e-mail: Kevin.Lyle@ontario.ca
From: @hotmail.com]
Sent: April-26-16 1:03 PM
To: Lyle, Kevin (MAG); mboothe@smockumzarnett.com; Rathwell, Nikita (MAG)
Subject: Are you ignoring me???
Mr. Lyle,
It’s been two weeks and you have yet to respond to my request for clarification.
Again, when you settled the order, you told me that “you” were signing and entering the orders.
However, the orders are were not signed by you. The signature of the AG/Registrar that entered the order is illegible and I require this information for my personal records. Will you identify the signature of the Registrar for me in order that I can update my records. Also send me a copy of the signed orders that were entered on behalf of the Sudbury CAS (Smokum and Zarnett) and the Ontario defendant’s (Attorney General of Ontario) if any.
Please acknowledge receipt of this email.
Thank you.
From: S>
Sent: April 15, 2016 11:14 PM
To: Lyle, Kevin (MAG); Peter Diavolitsis; SLessard@weaversimmons.com;gemcandrew@weaversimmons.com; mboothe@smockumzarnett.com
Subject: Re: We cannot hear you can you call back in.
Mr. Lyle,
Weaver Simmons, P. Diavolitsis, and S. Lessard sent me the order. However, when you settled the order, you told me that “you” were signing and entering the orders.
However, the orders are were not entered by you. The signature of the AG/Registrar that entered the order is illegible and I require this information for my personal records. Please identify the signature for me in order that I can update my records.
Thank you again for your assistance.
From: Lyle, Kevin (MAG) <Kevin.Lyle@ontario.ca>
Sent: April 15, 2016 8:54 AM
To:
Subject: RE: We cannot hear you can you call back in.
Will do
Kevin R. Lyle Manager of Court Operations For the Judicial Districts of Sudbury and Manitoulin Phone: 705-564-7769 e-mail: Kevin.Lyle@ontario.ca
From: @hotmail.com]
Sent: April-15-16 12:05 AM
To: Lyle, Kevin (MAG)
Subject: Re: We cannot hear you can you call back in.
scan+email
From: Lyle, Kevin (MAG) <Kevin.Lyle@ontario.ca>
Sent: April 14, 2016 4:28 PM
To:
Subject: RE: We cannot hear you can you call back in.
Do you want them sent via mail or scanned and e-mailed to you?
Please advise
Kevin R. Lylen Manager of Court Operations For the Judicial Districts of Sudbury and Manitoulin Phone: 705-564-7769 e-mail: Kevin.Lyle@ontario.ca
From: ]
Sent: April-14-16 3:36 PM
To: Lyle, Kevin (MAG)
Subject: Re: We cannot hear you can you call back in.
Send me a copy of the orders that you signed and entered.
From: Lyle, Kevin (MAG) <Kevin.Lyle@ontario.ca>
Sent: April 14, 2016 3:12 PM
To:
Subject: We cannot hear you can you call back in.
Kevin R. Lyle Manager of Court Operations For the Judicial Districts of Sudbury and Manitoulin Phone: 705-564-7769 e-mail: Kevin.Lyle@ontario.ca
Sudbury Personal Support Worker Miereil Andre and Sudbury legal team are a threat to everyone. Think of George Orwell’s 1984 and you’ll have a good picture of how issues are handled at the Sudbury MCSS, FRO and CA$. On November 27th, 2013 M. Verhagen, M. Andre MCSS, AG Registrar and Sudbury’s judicial branch filed a false claim for child support when Sudbury AG registrar D. Rorison knowingly accepted M. Verhagen’s motion and M. Andre’s affidavit which simply stated that they did not receive the dismissal notice that was sent to them and did not provide any explanation whatsoever as to why they did not receive it. And neither Judge R. Gordon nor Sudbury registrar D. Rorison thought that it was suspicious that nobody received dismissal order for my 2007 motion in which Judge P. Hennessey presided and order $616/month child support but no access or Police or CAS accountability.
iii) $14,000 to P. Jacobs M. Boothe counsel for the Children’s Aid Society of Sudbury;
iv) $11,000 to the Attorney General of Ontario’s N. Rathwell, B. Forson and M. Williams counsel for the Sudbury Crown Attorney defendants, J. Luczak, S. Bruce, J. Holland, MCSS, MCYS, and former Sudbury MPP R. Bartolucci.
The Sudbury MCSS, FRO and AG changed the amount allegedly owed to them on three different times!!!
1. September 8, 2014—$30,856.21 PLUS $400.00 enforcement fee claimed by Maria Aspens Director FRO.
2. September 23, 2014—$31,171.66 PLUS $400.00 enforcement fee claimed unidentifiable FRO Director.
3. September 24, 2014—$31,171.66 PLUS $400.00 enforcement fee claimed by Creselle Natola Director FRO.
The Liberals, FRO and judiciary can, and often do, deliberately ensure that the court process is taking too long and will take enforcement action against the payor. There are fees associated with every enforcement actions, for example a fee of $400 is charged to the payor if the FRO suspends their driver’s license. The fee structure takes money out of the hands of the children the office was set up to protect, especially when they charge a parent who has lost their job and their income. If the MCSS and FRO are neutral then shouldn’t no enforcement be taken if the payor is in the process of having it reviewed by the courts?
Ontario Liberals and the courts are capitalizing on this system to ensure that parents who try to work with the system are punished with huge administration fees (payable to the FRO) and even jail time. Is it any wonder the FRO doesn’t want to wait for the courts when they have such a lucrative administration structure in place?
The FRO is a government agency and thus immune to extortion laws governing Canada. The assumption that payors who get into arrears do so willfully falls into the same line of thinking as guilty until proved innocent. Penalizing payors who are struggling financially and threatening their livelihood by taking away their driver’s license, putting them in prison, or destroying their reputation will not help the children or recipient. The FRO was originally set up to solve the problem of deadbeat dads,but at what point do we say: STOP And begin solving the problem of deadbeat politicians and their employees?
Recent Comments