The Ontario Children’s Aid Society (CAS) is the most powerful agency in Ontario.  The key to understanding judicial corruption is the position of the  Chief Justice. The Chief Justice is the person who decides which judge will hear a particular case (Lambert. When the Chief Justice wants to fix a case, he or she will select a particular judge who can be relied on to produce the corrupt result,  regardless of any evidence or due process.  A number of Canadian legal commentators, including Ontario Justice Marshall and British Columbia Justice Bouck, have written on these issues.

Anyone who has ever had the misfortune of having to deal with the Sudbury CAS, Police and courts, either civil or criminal proceedings, will validate these statements….THEY ARE CORRUPT!

TRANSCRIPT Sudbury Lawyers Jean Paquette, K. Abbott, P. Bradley, S. Bruce, S. Stothard, R. Hurren John Luczak and North Bay Crown Attorney John Holland all belong to Ontario’s Northeast judicial branch of government – a special interest group that remains self-regulated.  The Sudbury Police used North Bay Crown Attorney John Holland’s affidavit  to obtain the search warrant and charge me for exposing CAS and Police corruption; and contravening section 136(4) of the Courts of Justice Act which states no person shall,(a) take or attempt to take a photograph, motion picture,  publish, broadcast, reproduce or otherwise disseminate a photograph, motion picture, audio recording.  

As a result of this website, Justice of the Peace (JOP) R. Beck (North Bay) issued a Search Warrant to Sudbury Police T. Bignocollo, C. Maki, R. Tiplady and the Sudbury Police pursuant to the Provincial Offences Act (POA). Then, JOP M. Moreau issued an order of disposition of the items seized AND illegally ordered the examination testing and reproduction of items seized.

But…Section 487.01 (1) of the CCC states that only “A provincial court judge, a judge of a superior court of criminal jurisdiction or a judge as defined in section 552 may issue a warrant in writing authorizing a peace officer subject to this section, use any device or investigative technique or procedure or do any thing described in the warrant that would, if not authorized, constitute an UNREASONABLE search or seizure in respect of a person or a person’s property”. Neither R. Beck  or M. Moreau are provincial court judges, or a judge of a superior court as defined in s.552 of the CCC.  It was unreasonable and illegal for the defendants to seize, search and made copies of the plaintiff’s computers and personal information.  The search warrant was in fact illegal.

Sudbury Crown Attorney Leonard Kim`s application to cancel the subpoenas. The Sudbury Crown Attorney, the Sudbury District Law Society and the judges of the Northeast are protecting Sudbury the Sudbury Police and CAS which is a private corporation and the corrupted lawyers.  At what point will the public demand proper prosecutions of our “political elite” including G. Lougheed and C. Prevost.  WHY SHOULD THESE PUBLIC SERVANTS LIVE OFF RETIREMENT and perks paid by taxpayers?

 Many families wind up with homes in foreclosure, when their homes were not in default at the time of entering the court system….  This has contributed immensely to prosecutorial misconduct and the mortgage foreclosure epidemic.  Notice to Excuse JJ Paquette, P. Meehan, R. Parise and Sgy. Wayne Foster from testifying granted by Judge Lambert.  The most egregious behavior is no doubt in the family courts and Children`s Aid Societies that employ uncertified Social Workers.

Sudbury Children’s Aid Society and others have been illegally practising social work…in our communities across the province. CAS investigating his own actions and defends CAS actions. 

In Sudbury provincial judges are appointed by the Ontario Liberals. There are no elected judges. This explains how the Liberal judicial branch of government (Sudbury judges R.D. Gordon, J.S. Poupre,  P.C. Hennessey and Crown attorney Pierre Bradley, Susan Bruce, Kenrick Abbott, John Luczak)  are all able to exert social control from within Sudbury’s Law Association and Ontario’s Law Society. Very rarely is a person entitled to a jury.
In civil cases (law suits) against the Government (Liberals) a person is NOT entitled to a jury. The key to understanding judicial corruption is the position of Chief Justice. The Chief Justice is the person who decides which judge will hear a particular case. When the Chief Justice wants a corrupt result, he or she will select a particular judge who can be relied on to produce the corrupt result….sudbury judges

so that they can edit and use their OWN their own transcripts! They will tell you to order THEIR court transcripts and that its not necessary to make a personal recording because the government (Ministry of the Attorney General-MAG) has a court reporter (uncertified).  They are in essence committing treason against the people. Sudbury’s Nor-ont Court Reporting Service Inc Weaver Simmons refused to be recorded sabotage,***

n makers and who and why tho$e decision$ are being made…which ultimately gave rise to Sudbury becoming a ROGUE city and the most difficult municipality the Ombudsman EVER had to deal with….specifically Sudbury’s Judicial branch of government. Judge Micheal Varpio awarding costs No judicial member has the right to abuse the public for their own gains
Government lawyers gaming the system through the process to maximise payments. Doing business Liberal style nets more business and more cash. Make the lie big, make it simple, say enough times, edit the court record, and when they read it they will believe it and then are only accountable to themselves and other members of Sudbury’s judicial branch. And it would appear they wote reasons and cost argument for Varpio in their Costs Outline.

Unsuspecting families think they are coming to a safe haven to resolve their family issues, until they find out years later that the reason court transcripts do not reflect the what actually transpired is because the Sudbury Attorney General employs uncertified court reporters.  The truth is the lawyers on either side work for each other- to meet profit quotas by steering the case.  The hourly rate at which you pay has more to do with how much influence the law firm has on the judge, than the quality of the legal work.

Wednsday July 13 /11 July 13/11 Sudbury Provincial Offences Office No 1

Wednsday July 13/11 Sudbury Provincial Offences Office No 2
Wednsday July 13 /11 July 13/11 Elm Street Courthouse Office No 3
Wednsday July 13/11 Sudbury Provincial Offences Office No 4
Thursday July 14 /11 July 13/11 Provincial Offences Office No 5
Thursday July 14/11 Sgt. Tim Burt – No. 8
Friday July 15/11 – Part 1 – Elm Street Courthouse No 9

#1 Sept. 21/11 Sudbury CAS Melanie McGraw

#2-Sept.21/11 Janet Lafave McGraw Sudbury CAS

May 9 and May 31, 2012 Sudbury Crown Attorney

July 12/12 Reply from the Judicial Council
August 15/12 Attorney General
On OCTOBER 5th 2012 Sudbury CAS claimed to be the victim of another crime re: exposing CAS corruption and was prosecuted by Sudbury Crown Attorney Leonard Kim on behalf of the Sudbury CAS JJ Paquette (victim). The purpose of this mock trial was to punish and discourage people from  exposing corrupt authorities.
  1.  July 8, 2014 Noront Court Reporting Service Page 1SEE July 8, 2014 Noront Court Reporting Service Page 2SEE July 8, 2014 Noront Court Reporting Service Page 3 SEE July 8, 2014 Noront Court Reporting Service Page 4
  2.  July 14, 2014 P. Diavoltsis Page 1 of 3SEE July 14, 2014 P. Diavoltsis Page 2 of 3 SEE July 14, 2014 P. Diavoltsis Page 3
  3. August 18, 2014 Amy Stein,David Jacobs
  4. October 10th, 2014 Sudbury Regional Manager Judicial ServicesSEE October 10th, 2014 Sudbury Regional Manager Judicial Services NO REPLY
  5.  October 15, 2014 judge P. Kane`s Amendments Page 1SEE October 15, 2014 judge P. Kane`s Amendments Page 2
  6.  October 20th, 2014 K. Boggs, Nadia MarottaSEE October 20th, 2014 K. Boggs, Nadia Marotta NO REPLY

October 22nd, 2014 Judge M. VarpioSEE October 22nd, 2014 Judge M. Varpio Page 2

So, when a crooked decision is needed for a political or business reason, the Chief Justice or Chief Judge has a group of crooked judges he knows he can rely on such as judge Kane formerly of the North East Region Sudbury…..The following was not accepted by the Registrar for filing and therefore does not form part of the public record…

1.COMMENTS ON DECISION C.A.S. MOTION AND BACKGROUND

2. COSTS COMMENTS ON JUDGE KANE’S DECISION GREATER SUDBURY POLICE SERVICE MOTION AND BACKGROUND

3. COSTS COMMENTS ON JUDGE KANE’S DECISION JJ PAQUETTE, P. BRADLEY, P. MEEHAN, and R. PARISE (FOUR SUDBURY LAWYER DEFENDANTS)

4. COSTS COMMENTS ON JUDGE KANE’S DECISION SUDBURY POLICE ASSOCIATION MOTION AND BACKGROUND

5. COSTS COMMENTS ON JUDGE KANE’S DECISION HPARB and B. PETRYNA MOTION

6. COMMENTS ON JUDGE KANE’S DECISION SUDBURY CROWN ATTORNEY (ONTARIO DEFENDANTS) AND BACKGROUND

7. PLAINTIFF’S POSITION ON JUDGE KANE’S DECISION TO AWARD COURT COSTS TO THE GREATER SUDBURY POLICE SERVICE AND SUDBURY POLICE ASSOCIATION

8. PLAINTIFF’S POSITION ON JUDGE KANE’S DECISION TO AWARD COURT COSTS TO JEAN JACQUE PAQUETTE, PIERRE BRADLEY, PATRICIA MEEHAN (SUDBURY LAWYER DEFENDANTS)

The “Judicial Branch” of government is operating as a racketeering crime syndicate. Our governments have always washed their hands of all contact with the legal system.  It is time for our governments to accept their obligations and responsibilities and properly and fully oversee and supervise our entire legal system in a manner that is fair, just and in the public interest.  If a jury made up of NON-lawyers is good enough to decide a murder case, then  it’s certainly capable of determining whether the CAS, Police, lawyer or  judge  has acted inappropriately.  Don’t you think so? Everyone needs to demand that massive reform be implemented immediately. Don’t wait until you become a target of the legal Mafia..